verified
Auto-translated

Mahfud MD: Death Penalty More Fitting for High-Profile Corruptors

Mahfud MD: Death Penalty More Fitting for High-Profile Corruptors

Former Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Mahfud MD stated that the death penalty is more appropriate for major corruptors like Dadan Hindayana. He thinks the punishment of cutting off hands doesn't compare to the state losses reaching trillions. Mahfud said light punishments actually benefit the perpetrators. He gave the example that in Saudi Arabia, hand amputation doesn't stop theft because repeat offenders keep committing crimes. He stressed the importance of removing corruptors' access and power so they don't repeat their crimes. His view also clarifies misunderstandings about applying Islamic law in corruption cases. https://www.gelora.co/2026/06/mahfud-md-rugi-kalau-dadan-dihukum.html

Comments

Share your perspective with the community.

brother
Auto-translated

The important thing is to strip all their access and power first. The death penalty is fine, but don't let them keep playing project games from inside prison.

brother
Auto-translated

The death penalty is fair for those who rob the people's money. But yeah, the process has to be really thorough, can't afford to get the verdict wrong later.

brother
Auto-translated

Mahfud's right, you know-light sentences just make corrupt officials even more comfy. Even in Arabia, cutting off hands doesn't stop people. Might as well just go straight for the death penalty!

brother
Auto-translated

Totally agree with Mahfud MD. Corruptors who steal trillions of rupiah like that really deserve the death penalty, so they learn their lesson and it actually deters others. Chopping off hands just doesn't cut it.

Add a new comment

Log in to leave a comment