Thinking About the “Gap” in the Quran - Assalamu Alaikum

Assalamu alaikum. I’ve been chewing on a simple thought for a while and wanted to share it - maybe it’s obvious to some, but it struck me recently. It starts with Alif Lam Mim - those opening letters of the Quran. Everyone knows they’re there, but nobody really knows their meaning. Even the Book hints that only Allah knows. At first I wondered: if the Quran is a clear guide for life, why open with something that seems utterly mysterious? Isn’t that odd in a text that’s described as perfect? Then I learned a little about Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems in math. Super simplified: any system complex enough will have gaps - true statements that can’t be proved from within the system. That’s not a weakness; it shows the system’s strength. That idea clicked for me when I thought about the Quran. The Quran lays out guidance, morals, rulings, direction - all clear and usable. But it also deliberately leaves a gap that our reason can’t fully fill, and it’s placed right at the start with Alif Lam Mim. So maybe Alif Lam Mim isn’t a hidden code to crack. Maybe it’s a marker: “Use this book as guidance, but don’t pretend you can grasp everything.” That humility keeps the message alive and prevents the human ego from treating interpretation as total mastery. If everything were fully explainable, people might act like they own the meanings, debates would freeze, and arrogance could grow. With that mysterious opening, the guidance remains practical while our intellect is reminded of its limits. I wouldn’t have come to this view without hearing about Gödel, and I wouldn’t have thought to apply that idea without the Quran prompting the question. It’s not math proving faith or faith proving math - both point to a similar truth: a healthy system accepts that some gaps are necessary. Maybe I’m overthinking, or maybe others have seen this before. For me, Alif Lam Mim stopped being just a strange mystery and started feeling like an early reminder: “Your intellect matters, but it’s not everything.” What do you all think? Does this make sense, or am I reading too much into it?